Weather Alert  

AIR QUALITY ALERT IN EFFECT FROM 11 AM SATURDAY TO 11 PM SATURDAY The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has issued an air quality health advisory for the following counties: Suffolk and Nassau. Air quality levels in outdoor air are predicted to be greater than an air quality index value of 100 for ozone. The air quality index, or A Q I, was created as an easy way to correlate levels of different pollutants to one scale. The higher the A Q I value, the greater the health concern. When pollution levels are elevated, the New York State Department of Health recommends limiting strenuous outdoor physical activity to reduce the risk of adverse health effects. People who may be especially sensitive to the effects of elevated levels of pollutants include the very young, and those with pre existing respiratory problems such as asthma or heart disease. Those with symptoms should consider consulting a physician. For additional information, please visit the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation web site at,, or call the Air Quality Hotline at 800-535-1345.

Long Island Woman Wins Battle over Prenup with Millionaire Husband Based on an Oral Promise

A prenuptial agreement has torn a married couple apart. The recent ruling around the case has caused a stir in the legal world. Are prenuptial agreements really set in stone?

Print Email

In New York, a prenuptial agreement is practically terms set in stone between married couples. The fact that a New York appeals court upheld a Long Island judge’s decision to void a prenuptial agreement over an oral promise is ground-breaking.

The case in point is between Elizabeth Cioffi-Petrakis, 39, and her Long Island millionaire husband worth up to $20 to $30 million, Peter Petrakis, 41.

Six weeks prior to the couple’s wedding date in 1998, Cioffi-Petrakis was presented with a prenuptial agreement with terms set that she would receive $25,000 for every year she was married to Petrakis and nothing else.

Cioffi-Petrakis refused to sign the prenuptial agreement, but she was given what appeared to be an ultimatum just four days before the big wedding day. She had to sign the prenup or the wedding that her father already paid $40,000 for was off.

To ease Cioffi-Petrakis into signing the prenuptial agreement, there was an oral agreement that Petrakis promised to destroy the document and would add Cioffi-Petrakis’ name to the house deed once the two had children.

Cioffi-Petrakis signed the prenuptial agreement with the oral promise in mind, but the oral agreement terms were never added to the document, nor did Petrakis keep his promise of destroying the document and adding her name to the house deed. The two have since had twin sons and a daughter together after their wedding date.

On Feb. 20, the case was won in Cioffi-Petrakis’ favor. The appellate court found the prenuptial agreement was “fraudulently induced.” The court believed Cioffi-Petrakis was tricked into signing the prenuptial agreement based on false promises. In the legal world, it is a landmark decision.

Cioffi-Petrakis spent several years arguing for the prenup to be torn up. She now plans to proceed with divorce as the prenuptial agreement has been cleared.